Many revolutionary factions deny their approval for the statement of a political solution in Syria

Eldorar Alshamia Editor | 16 September, 2015

ElDorar AlShamia:
A number of Syrian revolutionary factions denied to approve the statement throughput their official IDs , which welcomes the formation of a transitional governing body depending on the Geneva Conference.

A senior leader of the Ahrar al-Sham Islamic Movement  "Khaled Abu Anas", and a member of the Shura Council of the  Movement confirmed via a tweet on his account in the "Twitter" that the leaked statement has not been approved by the factions or they did not sign it, and have expressed reservations, blaming the people who leaked the statement the responsibility for this. Private sources in the movement confirmed the "ElDorar network" that who publish the statement adopted on approval figures do not represent the Movement, or do not represent the rest of the factions, and that it did not go beyond the stage of consultations ,as the sources confirmed.
For its part, the Information Office of the Army of Islam, confirmed to the ElDorar correspondent that the Army didn’t agree to this statement, and it was published without the Army knowledge.
According to the political officer of the al-Haq brigade "Abu Hashem Taftanaz" that the brigade did not resume to attend the consultations between the other factions, and whose goal is get out a unified position, and the reason that some parties want to prove the tutelage of the Syrian Coalition of the revolution, according to his words.
" Abu Hashem," added: "And then the  statement was issued mentioning to our name, we do not know its content just after its publication, and we did not agree to what it says in this way", blaming  those who wrote the statement and published it, and considering the Brigade can never be responsible for such a statement.
The official identifiers for "al-Sham Front", and "Islamic Union for Ajnad al-Sham" Brigades published the statement under the title: "statement factions of the Syrian Revolution", and this the statement image :