Find out the difference between these two Syrians TODDLERS
It appears on the right of the picture the Syrian infant "Qusay Bzmaoa," just 8 months old, who was killed by a barrel bomb in an attack carried out by al-Asad Aircraft on the city of Ariha in Idlib province, two days ago.
The toddler who appears on the left of the picture is the one who was founded by the Turkish Coast Guard drowned at the Turkish shore while his family were trying to migrate illegally via “death ships” across the Europe countries.
There is no doubt it’s a big ordeal to see Syrian children to be either drowned, burned or displaced persons is a heart-bleed scene ,but these two cases might be the only leaked ones to the media , while unseen tens of thousands of them are running.
Isn’t our right as Syrians to be inquiring: Why this very image – drowned toddler – the only one which got that wide-spread echo ,whereas the image of the slain infant who was killed by the Assad’s barrel bombs had only posted on a local page and never seen on the International , Western or Arab press coverage? So that's topped the Assad regime media channels?
There seems to be a decision in the media taking to turn the Syrian file from people revolted against their executioner, who goes far in killing them, to just a humanitarian catastrophe is recorded each time against unknown. The ‘conspirator media’ found in the form of the drowned toddler photo its ambition, so many newspapers and channels refrained to publish images of children were killed either burned to death or strangled by chemical weapons, because they will not be able to overlook the actor, who is actually known, because there is no one who has chemical and barrel bombs but the al-Assad regime while death by drowning may be held responsible for those who support the Syrian revolution, anyone who opened his country for fugitives from death or simply for the Coast Guard, humanitarian bodies, or for the countries which did not take their share of refugees and each party except al-Assad.
Can the ugliness and horror of the crime scene in the form of an infant who died due to the al-Assad barrels be less than the image of a child who drowned? That is the question! Isn’t a heinous crime in the two cases? Aren’t these newspapers circulating in the child's image today the same from the countries those vote in favor of depriving the rebels of the Anti-aviation that would stop the killing through barrel and container bombs, which prevents the Syrians to leave their own countries?